bronwynrh: (wet)
[personal profile] bronwynrh
And here I post it for all of you. It's easy to say I always figured this was true, now that there's an article about it, but really I did always think RT was a huge, screaming target.

Home Sweet Home, or a Bullseye?

(no subject)

Date: June 3rd, 2004 06:45 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: June 3rd, 2004 07:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dburr13.livejournal.com
with the way the world is today, such a disruption seems almost inevitible...and our president is leading us right to it with our britches down...we have been far too dependant for far too long on getting our energy fix from this very unstable part of the world...and eventually we will all pay the price for this wreckless policy.

(no subject)

Date: June 4th, 2004 07:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bramey.livejournal.com
I don't doubt it.

supply disruption?

Date: June 4th, 2004 08:57 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Rather than leading us down the path to disruption of our energy supplies with our britches down, Pres. Bush presented a plan to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. Suggest you review the current admins' position before tarring them with responsibility for our ongoing supply problem.

(no subject)

Date: June 3rd, 2004 09:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stylophonepet.livejournal.com
crazy crazy crazy

(no subject)

Date: June 4th, 2004 07:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bramey.livejournal.com
No kidding. It wasn't hard to imagine when, back in '90, they put those concrete barricades around all the public buildings in RT. . . but now the danger seems so much more immediate. Strange considering that missles were flying overhead back then.

Maybe I really was just too young to understand. I was more angry about the blackened skies and gulf waters and never thought of being afraid.

(no subject)

Date: June 4th, 2004 12:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curlicue.livejournal.com
Living on the space coast, we're always told we're a terrorist/russki target. Really? "Yes, along with 60 other potential targets throughout FLORIDA". Sixty in Florida? "Yes, among 1200 targets counrywide."

Allrightythen. What you're saying is that we're no bigger a target than, say, Kansas City. Right. Gimmee a break.

I guess I hate the alarmist mentality. But I've always thought US aggressors would come from the middle east, not the Soviet Union. (I'd have put my money on Libya, but I missed by several hundred miles).

I guess you realistically recognized RT's potential danger.

This really sucks.

And it's really lame that it's not getting good coverage on the news. A friend from australia told me how astonished she was that Americans have no appreciation for international news.

Ain't dat de trufe. If it doesn't involve Lacy Peterson or blowing up our troops in the Gulf War, Americans are totally ignorant.

(no subject)

Date: June 4th, 2004 07:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bramey.livejournal.com
Amen. I'd say I miss CNN International, but even they were choosy with their news. We'd be in our 'safe room' during an air raid, we could the bangs of SCUDS landing somewhere nearby. . . what was CNN talking about? Israel.

It was allllll about Israel.

My dad called the CNN reporter and complained to him about it. Reminded him that there were 40k Americans in KSA who might like a little information on the SCUDS flying through OUR neighborhoods. Dinks.

BBC isn't much better. I just stay away from the big networks and stick to Reuters and local sources to get my information. I don't give a rip about Scott Peterson or Michael Jackson :-D

(no subject)

Date: June 4th, 2004 07:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] potch1214.livejournal.com
Let ALONE what the House of Saud could do if they decided one day to just pull all their money out of the American Stock Market.

We'd be in a worse depression than in the 1930's.

Although it might be funny to see the Halliburton execs, suddenly borke, getting torn to shreds by us normal folks when they try to cut the line for gruel.

Course, then the question is raised...

Why is Saudi Arabia safe from Dubya's mandate that "if you harbor terroists, we're coming for you..."?

Money and oil. THAT'S why.

Yes, being in bed with this lunatics is gonna come back and bite us on the ass one day...

(no subject)

Date: June 4th, 2004 07:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bramey.livejournal.com
Remember, though, that the Saudis depend as much on us and foreign labor than even we do on them. At least we have reserves and know-how. They're floating on the shit, but don't have what it takes to pump and process it. Ok, some of them do - I'm not trying to over-generalize, but the Saudi culture I know is one that is largely uninterested in hard work or physical labor.

(no subject)

Date: June 4th, 2004 08:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] potch1214.livejournal.com
the Saudi culture I know is one that is largely uninterested in hard work or physical labor

Hmmm...

That's what the President of Nike told Michael Moore in "The Big One"...

But he was talking about Americans and why he has no problem having his shoes made in other countries.

(no subject)

Date: June 4th, 2004 08:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bramey.livejournal.com
I have no problem with outsourcing :-)
I have LOTS of problems with Michael Moore.

(no subject)

Date: June 4th, 2004 09:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] potch1214.livejournal.com
What?

It's cause he's fat, isn't it? 8^P

(no subject)

Date: June 4th, 2004 09:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bramey.livejournal.com
Yep, that's it :-P

Profile

bronwynrh: (Default)
bronwynrh

February 2012

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 08:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios